Posts Tagged ‘Communication’

Listening isn’t about getting information. It’s about building confidence.

Thursday, October 8th, 2009

Listening is by far the most important skill for a leader to hone. Have you ever seen a leader who seems unflappable and remains calm in even the most chaotic circumstances? Watch that person closely and you will see the secret to this cool demeanor—focused listening. As a leader, you need to pay attention to the words and actions of others while suspending judgment long enough to allow your intellect to catch up with your instincts. Why? If you speak too soon, you shut off creative impulse. You shut off collaboration. By speaking too soon, you force ideas on your team, even if that is not your intention. When you keep silent long enough to understand fully—not just hear—what someone is saying or doing, you create space for that person to invent, aspire, and contribute. By creating that space, you afford your team a sense of ownership, and you make room for the possibility that someone on your team has the best idea at this moment. By listening carefully, you sharpen all your senses and promote composure among those around you.

Pay Attention

There are many ways to listen; the most obvious is with your ears. However the act of listening is far more nuanced than just hearing words. To do it effectively you must pay careful attention to sounds and much more. The pace, breath, tone, and inflection of the voice all combine to provide the implied meaning, intentions, state-of-mind, and needs of the speaker. Reactions of your fellow listeners can also teach much. When you listen attentively, you shelve your own thoughts, and for a moment there is no judgment, no discrimination, no understanding. Only listening. When you listen deliberately, your mind—which is like a hyperactive dog pulling on a leash—soon starts barking with ideas, assumptions, interpretations, and decisions. If you can hold that dog off for a bit, you can listen with clarity, which leads to hidden insights. Insights that are very useful to a leader.

Listening is not for ears alone. When you practice listening, you sharpen your other senses—sight, smell, taste, and touch. When you listen carefully with your ears, you can sense tone and inflection, cadence and emphasis—all of which combine to provide insight into the meaning of the words spoken. When you apply that same level of attention with your sight, you might notice a flicker in the corner of an eye, a twitch in the corner of a mouth, a shift in stance—all of which combine to provide insights into meaning both overt and covert. You develop a perception skill that few even know exists, let alone master.

Our wonderful human brain can simultaneously process observations made with all our senses. Listening as a practice sharpens that awareness automatically and leads to clearer perception of what is happening with the people on your team and in their environment. This clearer perception leads to competitive advantage because you can identify critical cues about intentions and motivations.

Are You Listening?

Most schools don’t teach listening. Neither do most parents. The closest we get to teaching children to listen is concentration games such as I Spy, Where’s Waldo? and Memory Match Cards, which emphasize keen observation but not listening per se. Early in childhood, by the third grade in the communities I have seen firsthand, we move our kids’ efforts toward serious academic pursuits, which usually involve more than a decade of frenetic preparation for scarce slots among top universities. As a result, we produce well-educated men and women with a singular need to demonstrate that they are the smartest person in the room, who vie to answer first, and who are not very practiced at listening. How many times have you come across this person in your career? Are you one of them?

Some kids growing up in this education system react to competition by becoming a class clown in an attempt to divert academic scrutiny or out of scorn for it. No listening there. Those who cannot compete in the “speed-answer-game” or the corollary “snarky-comment-game” often give up. For them, daydreaming or socializing becomes a deeply ingrained habit. Listening loses out here, too. Other kids end up pursuing non-intellectual competition, usually focused on running or retaining possession of a fast-moving ball. These more athletic youngsters might learn to listen to a coach, but if you have ever coached kids, you know they aren’t usually listening; they just get skilled at looking as if they are.

In other words, education, development, and training in every country on earth are invested in sharpening competitive skills. This is indeed necessary for leadership, but it is not sufficient. I have spent much of my life perfecting a competitive instinct. I love competition, thrive on it, and believe it is the fuel that makes a democracy and capitalism possible. What I find disappointing is that in the midst of all the competitive juices flowing in academic, athletic, and professional endeavors, we neglect to develop the most important skill we will ever have—careful listening. It is the doorway to understanding our world and our place in it, and is the source of every great leader’s strength.

If this doesn’t make sense, consider the fact that a professional baseball coach doesn’t win by hitting a home run.  A baseball coach wins by getting the team to function well and consistently over the course of nearly one hundred ninety games each season. He assembles a team that has the potential to win. There are key athletes on the team that can hit home runs when needed most. There are those who pitch well at the beginning or at the end of a game.  There are others who field the ball well together and make brilliant defensive plays. To guide a team to victory, the baseball coach must have a very clear awareness of the abilities, temperament, and condition of each member of his roster, and an awareness of each of these critical areas is best sharpened by practicing clear and concentrated listening every day on and off the field. With a competitive drive, the coach will make the effort to lead the team well. And, if he listens well and pays attention with all his senses, the coach can consistently lead them to win.

Listen and Learn

Listening is a skill that, like any other, is mastered only through practice. And because listening isn’t part of the standard primary or secondary curriculum, we are all sorely in need of practice. Our minds are very busy. You and I and every person trying to lead an organization has a mind that acts like a dog sniffing, chasing, and barking at shadows and leaves rustling in the breeze. Learning to listen meticulously is a lot like training a dog. Want to learn how? Let’s practice.

Breathe. Find a quiet place. Sit still and comfortably with a reasonably straight but relaxed spine. Close your eyes. Bring all your awareness to your breath as you inhale and exhale as fully and deeply as you can. Allow your mind and body to relax and settle a bit as you use the breath to bring yourself into the present moment.

Observe. Open your eyes and look down at what is in front of you. With your eyes open, you are less likely to start daydreaming. For this practice to be effective, be sure to stay awake and present. What do you hear? Can you hear traffic? Birds chirping? People talking nearby? Your heartbeat? The blood rushing in your ears? A clock ticking? Your breath? Let your mind roam and listen to everything around you, all while your eyes are open.

Concentrate. With your eyes still open, concentrate on your slow, deep breaths in silence. Listen to each breath carefully as it enters your nostrils, passes through your trachea, fills your lungs, and then reverses. Continue to listen to the inhales, exhales, and subtle spaces in between. These sounds and the sounds of all the activity around you can each be perceived individually and collectively in each breath. Every time your mind wanders away from your breath, just smile, take an extra deep breath, and start again. You are concentrating on one point amidst all the activity around you. Just breathe. You are training your mind to sit still instead of roam.

Awareness. You may get bored listening to your breath. You might become frustrated that you end up in a daydream after each few breaths, even though your eyes are open. You might feel antsy. You might realize you are hungry. No matter what you experience, whenever you notice that you have strayed from your breath, you are having a spark of awareness—you just woke up. Use that awareness and just come back to studying each breath while you observe all the other sounds around you and in you. Practice patience with yourself. Practice calm control. Practice staying present. You are gently training your concentration to come back on command.

Practice. Do this for at least five minutes every morning or evening, whenever you are likely to consistently set time aside. If you enjoy this practice, do it for ten or fifteen minutes every day or try it for five minutes three times a day. After two weeks, apply your honed, concentrated listening to someone speaking to you. If you notice that your mind wanders, becomes bored, or starts coming up with ideas while that person is speaking, use that same spark of awareness to return to the speaker. Come back to their voice, just like you came back to studying breaths. With practice, you will notice that you aren’t drifting as much, and you will start to see, hear, and feel cues you may never have noticed before.

Listening Inspires

Leadership is a relationship, and listening is essential to building successful relationships. When people are heard fully and completely, without interruption and without debate until they have finished their point, they are more likely to trust you. They are far more likely to be receptive to whatever ideas you would like them to consider—whether it is a request you are making of them or an opinion you would like to share with them.

Have you ever seen a leader checking email messages on a laptop, BlackBerry, or iPhone during a meeting? Are you one of those leaders? Not only is this enormously disrespectful, it is self-defeating. By not listening and observing, you miss the most valuable information you need to lead, and you simultaneously devalue the speaker and the others in the room. Pay attention to the people in the room or cancel the meeting. Listening isn’t just about getting information you need; the act of listening is the primary tool you have to inspire and motivate others.

It doesn’t take much effort to become a more effective listener. Consistent practice is essential. If you start now, in a few weeks you will already be a more skilled listener than the majority of people on the planet. The average adult attention span has been conditioned by years of television and Web browsing to last only about twenty seconds.9 So if you can focus your attention for five minutes, then you will be operating fifteen times higher than the average. Not a bad start. Even more valuable, by practicing calm listening every day, your demeanor begins to adjust. You begin to be more deliberate, even in the midst of noise and chaos. You will appear unflappable, which is always inspiring. Your natural levels of passion and enthusiasm will not be dampened—they will be more focused.

People will start to take notice and you will too. What are you waiting for? Try it right now. We are at the end of this post. It is a good time to take five minutes to practice listening. And always remember the ancient wisdom of Epictetus:  We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.

QUICK CUES—LISTENING

  • Be still and silent.
  • Relax your mind and observe.
  • Use your breath to focus your attention.
  • Let go of expectations and judgments.
  • Stay present and focused on your breath.
  • Each time you drift from observing your breath, gently guide yourself back to it.
  • Do this, in silence, five minutes every day.
  • Apply this deliberate awareness to all situations.

Of stinger missiles and sheep testicles

Friday, June 19th, 2009

In the 1980′s I had the pleasure of travelling all over the Middle East.  Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Egypt, etc.  Among the many interesting projects I worked on, I was particularly in love with a crazy experiment to slurp radar data from AWACS, E2C, and missile systems in the forward area (that’s where all the scary noise is) and munge all that radar data into one complete picture locating the bad guys and good guys and displayed neatly onto a metal suitcase version of a laptop.  I think it was made by Compaq and looked something like this.

Mind you, in 1988 “laptop” meant something very heavy and very lame compared to what it means today. We gave those 14 pound laptops (with a whopping 8Mhz clock and all of 16MB of RAM…) to stinger missile teams. Now those guys are each already packing at least 60 pounds of gear per person into the forward area. They weren’t too happy with this new piece of heavy gear to lug.  Until of course they saw what it did for them.  You see, a stinger missile team normally had to use binoculars (or their Jedi mind training) to anticipate where MiG’s or F15′s would appear in order to shoot them down. These jets were able to go from the horizon to over your head in about 1.5 seconds.  This new piece of iron showed the stinger teams where the bad guys were long before the bad guys were at the horizon and therefore long before they could pose a threat. Advantage Stinger Team, 100.  Bad Guys, 0.  The already heavily burdened stinger teams lugged the new iron.

So I was in Egypt.  My team was tweaking a missile firing test to show our hosts how well it worked in the desert. We had some down-time to visit the pyramids. That was very cool (and a story for another Friday…) Then we packed into transport trucks and headed well north of Cairo into an empty expanse of sand and dirt in the Sahara and we promptly shot down the test target. Extremely cool. The generals were impressed. We were elated.

By this time in my career I was an old hand in the Middle East.  I could read and speak and even write a bit of Arabic.  The food was familiar and so were the customs.  We finished off the trip with a well deserved celebration meal, held of course by the host.  The most senior host suggested we dine at the The President’s Club.  Of course we agreed. We had visions of arriving at The Intercontinental Hotel in a tux to eat and drink a first-class French meal. This was welcome especially after a week of eating MREs in the dirt and if we were lucky, local shawarmas.  Instead, we were hauled via a harrowing cab ride (another story for another Friday…) into a seedy section of Cairo.  The pub name was indeed The President’s Club, which was inscribed above the door not in English nor Arabic but as we had hoped, in French. Only bits and hints of the gilt and black lacquer that once adorned the creaking, carved, wooden sign (carved when Rommel still roamed these parts) were still there.

In this basement hole in the wall, we sat among wealthy, well dressed locals.  Some in fine Italian, handmade suits.  Some in a silk and wool dishdash, equally well tailored.  We were served Johnny Walker Black by a nice waiter in a tux and we skipped the ice or water because it was, after all, Cairo.  Not one bottle.  Not two.  We had three bottles of Johnny to serve five people.  That certainly took the edge off.  We ate a kind of Egyptian tapas.  Sheep’s brains served raw in lemon juice, or boiled in a bit of saffron broth, or deep fried.  Nice choice. We had goat skewers and mutton skewers. Better.  We ate tomatoes and cucumbers and hummus.  And then came a nutty, crunchy tasting substance that had the texture of a bamboo shoot in Chop Suey.  Except a little chewier.  After asking my host what it was, he slurred whiskily that they were yummy sheep testicles. They were like their sheep brain appetizer cousins served raw in lemon juice, or boiled with saffron, or deep fried. No tartar sauce.  Too bad.  Messr. Walker urged me to keep my mouth shut, jut my chin firmly, smile, and eat a second helping like my host. I chewed merrily and washed it down with some more Johnny.

The next morning, I was on a long plane flight back to the states. I had little sleep and was still reeking of whiskey and burping up occasional whiffs of nuttiness as my cab took me to a friend’s birthday party. We ate his favorite meal:  Maryland Blue Crabs steamed in the bushel, served with corn on the cob, cheddar cheese and a massive amount of Old Bay Seasoning leaving nothing but fire and thirst in its wake.  The sheep were long gone.

And it was indeed, good to be home.

The Changeling

Thursday, November 13th, 2008

In just a few months, we have seen several stunning transformations of Governor Palin. The once unknown Governor of our mostly frozen frontier state burst onto the world stage. Instantly she was vilified by countless women who blogged, emailed and kvetched out loud that she was a terrible mom for accepting McCain’s offer.  Her nomination drew raised eyebrows from most politicians and news anchors. McCain – in their expert view – was betting it all on red. For the establishment on the Left and Right, she was as welcome as a polar bear sniffing at the igloo door. We had met Sarah The Usurper.

She then gave some speeches filled with GOP soundbites and folksy colloquialisms, and TA-DAH, suddenly she was hailed as our GOP Joan of Arc by thousands of ardent evangelsits and evn more midwestern farming familes thrilled that someone lively had joined McCain as running mate. We had met Sarah The Orator.

FOX news was giddy. MSNBC was laughing nervously. CNN was harrumphing because they couldn’t get an interview. After the GOP handlers finally conceeded an interview with the gentle Katie Couric, we discovered that Sarah Palin might in fact be related to the comedian Michael Palin, who brilliantly portrayed the village idiot in more than a few hilarious Monty Python episodes.  We had met Sarah The Bumbler.

It’s still hard for me to believe that anyone can be that terrible in a TV interview with someone as friendly as Katie Couric. Could Sarah Palin really be that incompetent; that inarticulate? My 9th grade daughter could have answered those questions better. How could someone so lame have achieved the pinacle of state leadership? Alaska is a remote wilderness filled with lonely men who spend way too many months in the subzero dark. It’s possible they may have voted with their loins more their minds when they elected Ms Palin. We had met Sarah the SNL Ratings Booster.

But we have experienced yet another Sarah Palin since then. In the past week, she has acquired more media coverage than in all her prior years as mayor, governor and VP candidate combined. Her expressions are still folksy, but she is tough, outspoken, and seems to have more than one brain cell after all. You dont have to agree with her, but you do have to acknowledge that she is at least as intelligent as any of the people interviewing her. We have met Sarah The Redeemed.

So what’s next for this shape shifter; this changeling? Without doubt, it has been a fascinating display of political trial by fire. It has also been a great lesson in how our opinions and our perceptions about a political figure can be molded by snippets of video on TV or youtube. Marshall McLuhan said “the medium is the message” and perhaps we have seen with Ms. Palin that the medium is the persona. Surely she hasn’t changed at all. Surely she is just a frail human being who sincerely thinks she can do something significant with her life for the benefit of others. Perhaps one day we will get to see see the real Sarah Palin, Moose Burgers and all. Until then, we will have to live with a changeling.

 

Interview with Pamela Richarde

Monday, April 7th, 2008

clip_image001.jpgPamela Richarde Past President of International Coaching Federation

Pamela is a charming and insightful leader. She has led an interesting and eclectic career in the Performing Arts, in Education, building her own businesses, and serving as Vice President & COO at Coach U, Inc . From 1996-2006 she helped create and then later led the International Coaching Federation (ICF) – a highly respected standards organization in the professional coaching field, serving over 14,000 members in over 80 countries.

Building the ICF
As one of the founding members and early leaders in the ICF, Pamela has keen insights into the challenges of building an organization from scratch. Her story begins with the motivation the early leaders had for creating the ICF: community and education. She was building a coaching business in the early 1990′s and like many others at that time, discovered that the market did not understand what a professional coach was. Nor was there any consistency in the definition of a professional coach, even among the more prominent schools who specialized in that field. “In order to help create a profession with competency based credentials, behavioral standards, shared best practices and effective self-regulation, I joined a number of prominent founders of coaching schools in a conversation to try to create and promote unity of purpose and process.”

As you can imagine, the challenges in forming the ICF were immense. At that time, if professional coaching was even heard of, it was viewed by most as a frivolous soft skills consultancy or worse, as a kind of charlatan psychotherapy. The challenges faced by Pamela and other early leaders of the ICF included not only the education of a marketplace; it also required the typical herding of cats in a startup and merging many strong egos into a unified vision for the profession. She describes her leadership model as “heart-centered” with her view of the role of leader as “inspiring others to greatness rather than laying down the law by wielding power.” Her approach is similar to the somewhat over-marketed term “servant-leader” so frequently quoted by politicians, pastors, and business leaders these days.

Heart-centered leadership
Pamela’s heart-centered leadership model builds on three pillars, “know thyself, inspire other to greatness, and defend the decisions made by team as if they were your own.” Using that platform, she focused first and foremost on exploring what was common among the founding members of the ICF. She did not sell her own vision to her peer group. In fact, she probably would have failed if she had tried that approach. As she explained, “Some of the first board members of the ICF were well established, internationally renowned experts in professional coaching with strongly held views.”

Instead, Pamela chose to remain open and curious even when the conversation went to places she didn’t agree with. “As a result, I was in a better position to facilitate and co- lead this group of passionate and insightful people.” She goes on to say, “We saw early on that there was already great enthusiasm and passion for the conversation” and she used that enthusiasm as a rallying point to help get the team through the more challenging debates. No matter what obstacles appeared during a specific negotiation, most often Pamela could bring the team back to center with an agreement that the debate itself was productive, no matter how contentious.

What became clear in those early ICF conversations was a shared view on the core competencies of a professional coach, even though there were radically different approaches to training, development, philosophical base, or the coaching process itself. She explains, “This early insight by the team led to a productive conversation about the standards for coaching.” This allowed the team to come to a firm resolution. And that agreement in turn served as the foundation for additional areas of agreement as time went on.

Ownership
In Pamela’s heart-centered leadership model, there is a sense of ownership that is different from other leadership models. If you are selling your vision to a group, you certainly own that vision. But if you are inspiring the team to agree upon a shared vision, if you use your role as leader as foil for the debate, seed of discussion, builder of compromise, then the outcome isn’t yours. It belongs to the team. In order to create confidence among that team; to give them permission to take a strong stance on a risky position, Pam believes, “you need to be willing to be publically responsible for the decision made by the team. You create a space and freedom to fail. Trust is formed by standing up for the decisions made by the team and defending their position as though it were your own.” Of course, it follows that when the outcome is clearly successful, the heart-centered leader must then ensure the team gets credit for that success.

Source of leadership inspiration
This heart-centered leadership model is challenging enough. Using it during the formation of a new organization in an embryonic market filled with misinformation was daunting. Pamela was confident, however, because her style had evolved over a many years and different career phases. Her path in heart-centered leadership began in High School, where she had a drama teacher that called upon her to learn a new character role in only a few days to step in for a student who had abandoned the play. In the skillful hands of that director, Pamela discovered abilities she didn’t have and she watched him also draw performances from actors who had no idea they could act. That inspired her to pursue a career in the Performing Arts and to acquire the skills of a stage director. She says, “I learned that pulling together lights, sound, and whatever talent pool showed up for auditions, then revising the script to accommodate what I had to work with for that production – that process itself was the performance. Great results are self-evident to an audience if the creative process is treated as the reason for the effort.”

Whom do we serve?
Among the many debates by the ICF board members, the debate about the definition of “customer” for the ICF gave rise to a number of operational impacts. They argued:who is our client? Our members? The profession itself? The clients of the coach? What about the training organizations and schools? In the end, it was agreed that the membership of the ICF was the customer. But it was also agreed that no major decisions could be made without considering the impact on the stakeholders who helped make the ICF possible. This was easy to say but hard to implement. For example, the training organizations were often inadvertently left out of decisions and forgotten in important communications regarding changes to the emerging credentialing standards and processes. Though never intentionalt it caused unwanted friction. After years of practice, the ICF now has implemented a thorough decision making and communication protocol to consult with or inform stakeholders as required to ensure a smoother operation.

Having said all that, the ICF had a parallel mission it could not shirk. While the ICF had defined its membership as the customer and organizing principle, the ICF also had to educate the marketplace on professional coaching and what standards clients should seek in a professional coach. As a result, the ICF had to consider the clients of the coach as part of its stakeholder base. By that definition, most of humanity is a stakeholder which made segmentation for messaging a monstrous challenge that the ICF still grapples with today.

Know thyself
One of the operating challenges facing the ICF board in the early days was that the board members were experts in the practice of coaching and their own business, they were not necessarily experts in building a non-profit organization, professional association, or standards body. Pamela recalls, “The professional coaching process can fall short when trying to run a business.” A business management team needs to make decisions, take risks, evaluate performance, set objectives, and manage plans. Coaching can help you do all those things better but a coach doesn’t take those actions for the client. So in the same way that a sales associate promoted to manager suddenly finds himself not quite as competent at leading a team as he was selling the product, the ICF leadership team found its core competencies in coaching not completely sufficient to build and run a coaching federation. “We had hired a management firm and later hired an independent consultant to conduct a business audit of operational and governance processes and to establish benchmarks for performance.” This led to a management overhaul run by operational experts that set the stage for the growth that the ICF has enjoyed ever since.

Handling dissent
In her role as ICF President, Pamela had to travel the world and work with many different people. She learned to enjoy them all “even the grumpy ones because I came to see that their dissent led to insights that would not have come forward without them. The only times I really was irked was dealing with those who were stuck on only one way of looking at possible solutions.” When I asked her how she overcame this, she said “retaining self control. Not jumping into a debate; giving the dissenter and naysayer the opportunity to be fully heard: To fully make their case and to acknowledge their input.” Then she could say “Thank you for making that clear. And in addition to that well explained view, there are perhaps other ways to look at this…” which provided her a free and clear platform to allow someone else to make a case for the plan that caused the dissent in the first place.

Source of Joy
In all her travels to build and promote the ICF globally, Pamela discovered that no matter what country she was in, no matter how different the culture or challenges were the same principals of good business applied. Business is conducted among human beings and the most successful approach is asking “How can I help?” In Korea, significant focus of the ICF was on serving students who came to their first jobs already suffering burn-out after years of intense pressure to compete in school. By contrast in Bogota, significant focus of the ICF was on creating sustainable economic growth among the poor. In each place that ICF members worked, the basic intention was the same – helping other people succeed in their endeavors – and in each place that simple intention came alive in exciting, different activities. This inspired Pamela to work even harder to build the ICF and to share those many different approaches and common insights everywhere she travelled.

A Challenge
There is one insight that came from this conversation with Pamela about leadership that serves as a challenge to all leaders. A heart-centered leadership model requires a simple focus that anyone can apply immediately. Know yourself completely. Know your strengths, weaknesses, aspirations and fears. Inspire others to step up and achieve greatness. And then have the courage to allow others to explore and express their own vision for your organization.

© 2008 BlueSeven Partners, LLC